Lano vs Payfit
Both cover onboarding workflows, leave management, joining documents and e-signature and employee records. Only Lano lists multi-country payroll. Only Payfit lists single-country payroll, payroll tax filing, performance reviews and pulse surveys. Lano has 23 integrations listed; Payfit has 12.
| Attribute | Lano | Payfit |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Payroll | Payroll |
| What it covers | Multi-country payroll, Onboarding workflows, Leave management, Joining documents and e-signature, Employee records | Employee records, Single-country payroll, Payroll tax filing, Leave management, Joining documents and e-signature, Onboarding workflows, Performance reviews, Pulse surveys |
| Countries | Global | United Kingdom |
| Company size | Any size | 1–1,000 employees |
| Pricing model | Per employee | Not published |
| Approx. price | €3–499 per employee / month (vendor's site) | Not published |
| Open API | Yes | Yes |
| File import / export | Not stated | Not stated |
| Certifications | None listed | ISO/IEC 27001, HMRC recognised payroll software, RTI certification, Automatic enrolment certification, BACS certification, Faster Payments certification |
| Integrations listed | 23 | 12 |
| Vendor-confirmed listing | No | No |
| AI agent | No | Yes |
Which one fits you? The answer depends on your countries, size and the systems it must connect to. Get a free match score for both in a short chat.
Score them for my company