Lano vs OnPay
Both cover onboarding workflows, leave management, joining documents and e-signature and employee records. Only Lano lists multi-country payroll. Only OnPay lists org chart, employee self-service, single-country payroll, payroll tax filing and attendance tracking. Lano has 23 integrations listed; OnPay has 7.
| Attribute | Lano | OnPay |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Payroll | Payroll |
| What it covers | Multi-country payroll, Onboarding workflows, Leave management, Joining documents and e-signature, Employee records | Employee records, Org chart, Employee self-service, Single-country payroll, Payroll tax filing, Onboarding workflows, Joining documents and e-signature, Leave management, Attendance tracking |
| Countries | Global | United States |
| Company size | Any size | Any size |
| Pricing model | Per employee | Per employee |
| Approx. price | €3–499 per employee / month (vendor's site) | from $6 per employee / month (vendor's site) |
| Open API | Yes | Not stated |
| File import / export | Not stated | Not stated |
| Certifications | None listed | None listed |
| Integrations listed | 23 | 7 |
| Vendor-confirmed listing | No | No |
| AI agent | No | No |
Which one fits you? The answer depends on your countries, size and the systems it must connect to. Get a free match score for both in a short chat.
Score them for my company