Lano vs Pebl (formerly Velocity Global)
Both cover multi-country payroll, onboarding workflows, leave management, joining documents and e-signature and employee records. Only Pebl (formerly Velocity Global) lists candidate sourcing and compliance training tracking. Lano has 23 integrations listed; Pebl (formerly Velocity Global) has 15.
| Attribute | Lano | Pebl (formerly Velocity Global) |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Payroll | Payroll |
| What it covers | Multi-country payroll, Onboarding workflows, Leave management, Joining documents and e-signature, Employee records | Employee records, Multi-country payroll, Joining documents and e-signature, Leave management, Onboarding workflows, Candidate sourcing, Compliance training tracking |
| Countries | Global | Canada, Mexico, India |
| Company size | Any size | Any size |
| Pricing model | Per employee | Per employee |
| Approx. price | €3–499 per employee / month (vendor's site) | from $399 per employee / month (vendor's site) |
| Open API | Yes | Yes |
| File import / export | Not stated | Not stated |
| Certifications | None listed | None listed |
| Integrations listed | 23 | 15 |
| Vendor-confirmed listing | No | No |
| AI agent | No | No |
Which one fits you? The answer depends on your countries, size and the systems it must connect to. Get a free match score for both in a short chat.
Score them for my companyLano alternativesPebl (formerly Velocity Global) alternativesBest payroll software