Lano vs Oyster
Both cover multi-country payroll, onboarding workflows, leave management and employee records. Only Lano lists joining documents and e-signature. Only Oyster lists employee self-service. Lano has 23 integrations listed; Oyster has 18.
| Attribute | Lano | Oyster |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Payroll | Payroll |
| What it covers | Multi-country payroll, Onboarding workflows, Leave management, Joining documents and e-signature, Employee records | Employee records, Multi-country payroll, Employee self-service, Onboarding workflows, Leave management |
| Countries | Global | Afghanistan, Albania, Andorra, Antigua & Barbuda, Argentina, Armenia, Aruba, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Bangladesh |
| Company size | Any size | Any size |
| Pricing model | Per employee | Per employee |
| Approx. price | €3–499 per employee / month (vendor's site) | from $699 per employee / month (vendor's site) |
| Open API | Yes | Yes |
| File import / export | Not stated | Not stated |
| Certifications | None listed | Certified B Corp |
| Integrations listed | 23 | 18 |
| Vendor-confirmed listing | No | No |
| AI agent | No | No |
Which one fits you? The answer depends on your countries, size and the systems it must connect to. Get a free match score for both in a short chat.
Score them for my company