Metaview vs Workable
Both cover candidate sourcing and interview scheduling. Only Workable lists applicant tracking, onboarding workflows, joining documents and e-signature, employee records, org chart, employee self-service, leave management, attendance tracking, shift scheduling and performance reviews. Metaview has 41 integrations listed; Workable has 27. They connect to each other (native, found on vendor's site).
| Attribute | Metaview | Workable |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Recruiting | Recruiting |
| What it covers | Candidate sourcing, Interview scheduling | Applicant tracking, Candidate sourcing, Interview scheduling, Onboarding workflows, Joining documents and e-signature, Employee records, Org chart, Employee self-service, Leave management, Attendance tracking, Shift scheduling, Performance reviews |
| Countries | Global | Global |
| Company size | Any size | 1–any employees |
| Pricing model | Per user | Per employee |
| Approx. price | $100–300 per user / month (vendor's site) | $299–719 per month (whole company) (vendor's site) |
| Open API | Not stated | Yes |
| File import / export | Yes | Not stated |
| Certifications | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, CCPA, LGPD, PIPEDA | ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3 |
| Integrations listed | 41 | 27 |
| Vendor-confirmed listing | No | No |
| AI agent | Yes | Yes |
Which one fits you? The answer depends on your countries, size and the systems it must connect to. Get a free match score for both in a short chat.
Score them for my companyMetaview alternativesWorkable alternativesBest applicant tracking systems and recruiting software