Applied vs Greenhouse
Both cover applicant tracking. Only Greenhouse lists interview scheduling, candidate sourcing and onboarding workflows. Applied has 0 integrations listed; Greenhouse has 31.
| Attribute | Applied | Greenhouse |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Recruiting | Recruiting |
| What it covers | Applicant tracking | Applicant tracking, Interview scheduling, Candidate sourcing, Onboarding workflows |
| Countries | United Kingdom | Global |
| Company size | 20–5,000 employees | 20–5,000 employees |
| Pricing model | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Open API | Not stated | Not stated |
| File import / export | Not stated | Not stated |
| Certifications | None listed | None listed |
| Integrations listed | 0 | 31 |
| Vendor-confirmed listing | No | No |
| AI agent | No | No |
Which one fits you? The answer depends on your countries, size and the systems it must connect to. Get a free match score for both in a short chat.
Score them for my companyApplied alternativesGreenhouse alternativesBest applicant tracking systems and recruiting software